AIDS is a serious subject. It changed the sexual
behavior of adolescents and adults in the last 15 years. Campaigns of prevention and the use of
prophylactics have led to a more responsible sexual behavior and to the reduction of other
sexual transmittable diseases. There exist, however, serious problems concerning the
manipulative information campaigns, which are based on unscientific material. As
observers, who analyze mainly the way of life of adolescents, of this phenomenon, which is
doubtless of social interest, we want to put light into the following questions:
Where is the
scientific proof that
heterosexuals, not weakened by the abuse of drugs or medicaments, can be afflicted by this
How has this
disease been used to criminalize homosexuals
or other minorities with sexual behavior judged as "deviate"?
In what dimensions has AIDS been used to modify the sexual
behavior of young people in a "moral" way, which should be done, if at
reasons of conscience and not because of irrational fear?
How much unjustified fear has been spread out under the
population, with results of phobias, an increase of hypochondriacs, the development of
senses of guilt, ecc.?
How much money has been distracted from the research for
other kinds of diseases even more devastating and concentrated on programs of
research, that, since now, haven't lead to any definitive outcome?
Why are poisons like
AZT, which is known to destroy the
Immune System, given to healthy persons just because of the common but unproved
assumption that HIV leads to AIDS?
more and more diseases, already known before the appearance of
'Aids' and having different causes,
are included in Aids-defining diseases (at present 30)? Is it to keep
statistics of Aids-cases high?
There exists a large movement of famous
scientists, physicians, health workers, spokesmen for civil rights movement and protection
of consumers who disagree with the official medical position and the pharmaceutical
industry, who line their pockets with the fear of people of AIDS. Famous searchers lost
their jobs after having scientifically claimed their suspicions, critical journalists have
been censored, and dissident physicians oppressed, for not supporting the official
position. Nevertheless, all their work is presented in the WWW, the only available free
space. While searching for the most interesting sites we have been astonished by the
quantity of censored scientific documentation we have found.
Why all this?
In these pages you can find
evidence for the manipulation of data, the distortion of news, of abuse and
which may help you to realize that the facts are different from the common opinion.
for an alternative 'definition' of AIDS