|
|
|
- STUDY GROUP AIDS THERAPY
- c/o Felix A. de Fries
- Eglistr. 7 CH-8004 Zürich, Tel. /FAX:
0041 1 401 34 24
- E-Mail: felix.defries@bluewin.ch
-
- Zurich, 5th August 2002
-
- The "HIV-vaccines" and the
attempts to prevent the access to effective treatment and diagnostics.
- Dear Sir or Madam
-
- With parts from nacked DNA the
promotors of the HIV-AIDS model try to produce
"HIV-vaccines" that should prevent persons with a negative
result in the HIV-antibody test
from developing AIDS-defining illnessesif they get
infected with the real HIV-virus. This effect would be demonstrated
after 5 or 10 years if less of the
participants in these tests (selected from
risk groups) develop AIDS defining illnesses, say their producers.
They state already that these vaccines
could not bring a secure protection against
the HIV viruses, "as these viruses mutate continuously".
- These vaccines produced by leading
multinational pharma companies, that are
now tested under the control of the CDC, should induce a higher
release of antibodies against the
proteins of the cell skeleton, that have been
defined to be the product of HIV-retroviruses. By this they could
effect a positive result in HIV-antibody
tests. In reality because of their
formulation the HIV-antibody tests dedect a a hightened titer of
antibodies to a defined scale of
cellular protein particles said to characterise
the presence of HIV above a certain level. (This scale of cellular
proteins is defined differently in the HIV-antibody-tests administrated
in African and Asian countries, than it is in antibody-tests administrated
in Europe, the USA or in Australia).
- After all the announcements made at
the International AIDS conference in Barcelona the medical world and
international media eagerly await to see if the postulated effects of these
vaccines can be chieved.
- At the same time as trials with these
vaccines are being carried out the multinational pharma companies and
their lobbyists are trying to prevent the access to the substances and tests
that have been shown to be effective in the treatment of AIDS
defining illnesses:
- -multi-national pharma companies have
tried to stop the distribution of herbal preparations that showed good
effects in the restitution of cellular immune reactions in
Switzerland and in India, as they try to isolate potent substances from these
plants and register patents on these substances.
- - the pharma multinational Aventis,
which is involved in the HIV vaccinetest, has cancelled the production of
the DTH-multitest (Mérieux-test, cutaneous anergy-test) that allowes
measurement the cellular defence capability (in persons with a positive
result in HIV-antibody-tests).
- - the members of the European
Parliament approved the EU Food Supplement Directive, that places access to
substances(vitamins, minerals, food supplements, amino acids,
herbal
prepartions) that have shown good effects in
the treatment of immune deficiencies under heavy restriction and have
thereby strenghtened the position of the
Rome-based Codex Alimentarius Commission,
a drug- and food-industry-controlled commission, that forces a
rigid control over diatry supplements.
This comission aims to establish its
standards world-wide within the Gatt trade agreement and remove the
supplement industry and the local
producers of herbal medicaments from the market.
(The lobbyists of these multinational pharma companies (such as
Pfizer, Glaxo, Merck, Astra Zeneca.
Johnson &Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
Novartis, Aventis, Pharmacia and Abott) and important pharma shareholders
(such as the Bush family as shareholder at Abott) will certainly
use their influence to make ratification of these standards pass
the US-congress.
- As these "HIV-vaccines"
cannot have any influence on the Th1-Th2 switch in
the cytokine-profile of CD-4
helpercells, which is the common agent in
most of the diseases that can define
the AIDS syndrome, they can not
inhibit the development of AIDS defining illnesses. The Th1-Th2 switch,
that comes about with a hightened
release of NO gas and a lack in
glutathione molecules, induces an
ongoing formation in the bone marrow of
antibodies to external antigens, an
ongoing inhibition of cellular immune
reactions (the detection and
destruction of cells containing viruses,
fungi and mycobacteria) and subsequent
the inhibition of the production of NO gas in the organism.
- As it was demonstrated by various
studies (that we have sent you earlier) the Th1-Th2 switch can be
deblocked by the administraion ofherbal antioxidants, amino acids,
fatty acids, vitamins, enzymes and minerals. By this means cellular
immune reactions can be restored and AIDS defining
illnesses can be treated efficiently.
- If access to these substances is
prevented by the multi-national pharma industry and by international and
national institutions, an effective treatment of AIDS-defining illnesses
will not bepossible any more. The monopoly then established would end
any freedom of medical treatment.
- We hope you do support health freedom
- With our best regards
-
- Felix de Fries
- Study group AIDS therapy
- FEATURE ARTICLE FROM THE ICHF
NEWSLETTER
- Codex: worldwide battle shaping up
over plans by pharma-globalists to ruin supplements
industry
-
- WORLDWIDE - Health-freedoms advocates
worldwide are gearing up for the November
meeting of the international Codex Alimentarius Commission at
which, it is feared, the German proposal
to essentially limit public access
to dietary supplements in virtually all countries - as a prelude to
knocking ut the industry globally -
will advance.
- Concerns have grown steadily that the
dictates of the Rome-based, United Nations-aligned Codex Alimentarius
Commission will be binding as nternational law and subvert the
sovereignty of member nations, including the US.
- Attempts to control the burgeoning
global supplements industry - perceived by international
pharmaceutical interests as a major economic threat - by "harmonizing"
and "standardizing" the doses and uses of the same have been strengthened by several
factors: In February, the European Union (EU)
parliament, while partially addressing dissidents’ views as
mounted through a vigorous anti- "EU vitamin directive" petition
unleashed continent-wide from Italy, nonetheless approved "safe upper
levels"for supplements based on "science" which dissidents
have found to be both flawed and fraudulent. EU decisions
apparently are not binding
until the Union’s Council of Ministers
accept them, so European
health-freedoms activists are continuing the petition campaign.
- Witnesses in opposition to the planned
Codex restrictions were reportedly
snubbed at a March "Codex vitamin oversight
hearing" of Rep. Dan Burton’s House Government Reform Committee,
leaving the field essentially to organizations which are in alignment
with the globalist supplement-control agenda.
- Last November, the "dietary
supplements sector working group" of the Transatlantic
Business Dialogue (TABD) agreed
on several Codex-like elements involving the
"harmonization" of a regulatory
framework for vitamin/mineral food supplements on both sides of
the Atlantic. TABD has described itself
as "a results-oriented forum that seeks
to increase trans-Atlantic trade and investment opportunities
through the removal of costly inefficiencies from excessive regulation, duplication
anddifferences in the EU and US regulatory systems and procedures
in a manner consistent with sustainable development. "Planned US participation in
March at a conference of the International Alliance of Dietary/Food
Supplement
Associations (IADSA) in South Africa seemed to fly
in the face of US
governmental assertions that regulations approved by Codex will not supersede
US laws and that concern over the same is a "non-issue." The
South African conference topic was creation of a "global regulatory model."
- Codex Alimentarius, attached to the
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)
of the United Nations, ostensibly is a commission set up toestablish
an international code of food standards through the UN and the
World Health Organization (WHO). In
fact, commission delegations largely reflect
international drug and food-processing interests, though often interspersed with "citizen"
groups which in turn are economically influenced
by the same interests.
- In prior Codex meetings, the German
plan to advance total control over dietary
supplements - leading to their removal as over-the-counter items
and subject to stringent prescription
regulation, as has happened in Germany
itself and to a lesser extent in other countries - has been blocked
by several delegations.
- Should the German proposals ultimately
be adopted by the Codex Committee on
Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) in Berlin in
November, the following draconian
measures would be the "law" according to Codex:
- - No dietary supplement could be sold
for preventive or therapeutic use.
- - No dietary supplement sold as a food
could exceed potency levels set by
- the commission.
- - Codex regulations for dietary
supplements would become binding.
- - All new dietary supplements would
automatically be banned unless they go
- through the Codex approval process.
- John Hammell, of International
Advocates for Health Freedom (IAHF), has played a key international role in
alerting the US, and the world, to Codex
operations.
- Not mincing words, Hammell said in an
Internet posting in January that: ". . . The citizens of the EU (European
Union) are being set up for genocide, and we don’t want it happening to us
here (USA) via ‘harmonization’ of our laws to a rapidly emerging,
grossly
restrictive, Codex vitamin standard.
- "The EU Vitamin Directive is in
the process of being shoved down the throats of people in Europe . . . This
will cause all 15 EU nations towalk in lockstep with Germany and
France. This is a full frontal assault on health freedoms worldwide by
multinational pharmaceutical interests."
|
